Uto, 22.05.2012.

RSS feed

 Novosti
Nvidia Kepler GK110 arhitektura
·····················································
Kaspersky Lab otvara ured za jugoistočnu Europu
·····················································
Intel Core vPro treće generacije
·····················································
70% računalnih korisnika u Hrvatskoj nabavlja piratski softver
·····················································
AMD Trinity
·····················································
Nvidia GTX670
·····················································
Asus N serija prijenosnika
·····················································
Samsung predstavio budućnost Smart TV-a
·····················································
KFA2 GTX 680 EX i LTD OC
·····················································
Micron kupuje posrnulu Elpidu?
·····················································
Shuttle XS36V
·····················································
Pioneer BDR-2207
·····················································
HGST SAS SSD
·····················································
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
·····················································
Canyon Stripes i Story nagrade

 Članci
Intel Core i7-3820 - četverojezgreni Sandy Bridge-E ····················································· Asus GeForce GTX680 DirectCU II TOP test ····················································· G.Skill Ares F3-2133C11Q-16GAO - četiri brza kanala ····················································· QNAP TS-879U-RP NAS - ni da, ni ne ····················································· Asus GeForce GTX670 DirectCU II TOP test ····················································· Sapphire Radeon HD7870 & HD7850 OC test ····················································· ASUS P8Z77-V vs. Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H - bitka za mainstream ····················································· Canyon STEALTH – tajnoviti noviteti ····················································· ASUS Maximus V Gene - malena a moćna ····················································· Intel Core i7-3770K & DZ77GA‐70K - Ivy Bridge arhitektura i performanse
 Download
CPU-Z v1.60 ····················································· GPU-Z v.0.6.0 ····················································· Catalyst 12.3 Vista i 7 driveri + CCC (64-bit) ····················································· Catalyst 12.3 Vista i 7 driveri + CCC (32-bit) ····················································· Catalyst 12.3 WinXP driveri + CCC (64-bit) ····················································· Catalyst 12.3 WinXP driveri + CCC (32-bit) ····················································· ForceWare 280.26 WHQL Vista i 7 za GF serije 6, 7, 8, 9, GT200, GT400 i GT500 (32-bit) ····················································· ForceWare 280.26 WHQL Vista i 7 za GF serije 6, 7, 8, 9, GT200 i GT400 (64-bit) ····················································· ForceWare 280.26 WHQL WinXP za GF serije 6, 7, 8, 9, GT200, GT400 i GT500 (32-bit) ····················································· ForceWare 280.26 WHQL Vista za GF serije 6, 7, 8, 9, GT200, GT400 i GT500 (64-bit)
Članci  
    Kategorije         Svi članci         Top hardware         Pretraživanje    

Asus GeForce ENGTX465 - dobar overclocker
14.07.2010.
    « Prev  : Stranica 3 od 5 :  Next »      By ::  Krešimir Matanović 
- Rezultati testova - 1.dio -

Aliens vs. Predator

1680x1050 @ 0xAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
94,333
  
Asus GTX470
79,525
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
75,582
  
Asus GTX465
66,828
  
 
025507510
0
 
1920x1200 @ 0xAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
79,65
  
Asus GTX470
64,508
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
62,055
  
Asus GTX465
54,867
  
 
025507510
0
 

U prvom današnjem testu vidimo kako je GTX465 u prosjeku oko 19% sporija od GTX470 kartice. Kada ju overclockiramo ta se razlika smanjuje na između 4 i 5%, što uopće nije loše.

Battlefield Bad Company 2

1680x1050 @ 4xAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
79,056
  
Asus GTX470
76,228
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
67,072
  
Asus GTX465
59,689
  
 
02040608
0
 
1920x1200 @ 4xAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
67,5
  
Asus GTX470
62,656
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
54,867
  
Asus GTX465
49,367
  
 
02040608
0
 

U BC2 se razmak između GTX465 i 470 povećava na preko 25% i vidljivo je kako joj ipak fali procesne moći od gotovo 100 shadera. Uz to i memorijska propusnost je znatno manja, pa ne čudi kako ni overclockingom ne uspjeva doći blizu jačeg modela.

DiRT 2

1920x1200 @ 4xAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
82,8
  
Asus GTX470
80,3
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
52,5
  
Asus GTX465
47
  
 
030609
0
 

Začudila nas je ovolika razlika u performansama u DiRT-u 2. GTX465 na referentnim taktovima je zapanjujućih 70%. Overclockingom, performanse su porasle tek za oko 12%.

Far Cry 2

1920x1200 @ 8xAA, 16xAF
Asus GTX470
69,91
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
61,96
  
Gigabyte HD5870
57,78
  
Asus GTX465
54,64
  
 
0357
0
 

U nešto starijem naslovu, u kojem testiramo 8xAA performanse vidljivo je kako GTX465 ovdje uspjeva biti vrlo blizu HD5870 modelu, te ga čak preteći kada je overclockirana.

Heaven Benchmark

1680x1050 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, No Tesselation (FPS)
Asus GTX470
46,1
  
Gigabyte HD5870
45,2
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
42,65
  
Asus GTX465
37,4
  
 
0102030405
0
 
1680x1050 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, Normal Tesselation (FPS)
Asus GTX470
35,6
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
32,62
  
Gigabyte HD5870
29,8
  
Asus GTX465
28,6
  
 
0102030405
0
 
1680x1050 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, Extreme Tesselation (FPS)
Asus GTX470
27,4
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
25,09
  
Asus GTX465
22
  
Gigabyte HD5870
18,6
  
 
0102030405
0
 
1920x1200 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, No Tesselation (FPS)
Gigabyte HD5870
38,1
  
Asus GTX470
37,6
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
34,4
  
Asus GTX465
30,2
  
 
0102030405
0
 
1920x1200 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, Normal Tesselation (FPS)
Asus GTX470
30
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
27,3
  
Gigabyte HD5870
26,3
  
Asus GTX465
23,9
  
 
0102030405
0
 
1920x1200 @ 4xAA, 16xAF, Extreme Tesselation (FPS)
Asus GTX470
23,5
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
21,55
  
Asus GTX465
18,9
  
Gigabyte HD5870
16,9
  
 
0102030405
0
 

Kao i kod prethodnog testa vidljiva je jačina Fermijeve teselacijske jedinice, no isto tako trebamo imati na pameti kako je ovaj benchmark dosta naklonjen Nvidijinim karticama. HD5870 polako propada na listi kako podižemo razinu teselacije, no u nekim konkretnim naslovima ipak je vidljivo kako zaostatak nije toliki.

Metro 2033

1680x1050 @ AAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
25,523
  
Asus GTX470
25,183
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
21,596
  
Asus GTX465
19,078
  
 
0132
6
 
1920x1200 @ AAA, 16xAF
Gigabyte HD5870
20,225
  
Asus GTX470
19,833
  
Asus GTX465 @ OC
17,501
  
Asus GTX465
15,461
  
 
0132
6
 

GTX465 u ovom vrlo zahtjevnom naslovu zaostaje za oko 30% za GTX470 karticom. Overclocking to popravlja, no i dalje je zaostatak veći od 15%.



 « Prev  :  Skoči na  :  Next »  
::  Isprintaj članak  ::  Vaš Komentar  ::  Top 





  Anketa
Na matičnu ploču trošim...
...500 - 1000kn.
...1000 - 1500kn.
...1500 - 2500kn.
...manje od 500kn.
...više od 2500kn.


  VI&MI
  » Pišite Nam!


  Worldwide
Suradjujemo sa:

ABIT
Albatron
AMD
AOpen
Apacer
ATi
Chaintech
Club3D
Cooler Master
Connect3D
Corsair
EPoX
Gainward
Gigabyte
Hitachi GST
Infineon
Kingmax
Leadtek
nVidia
Sapphire
Silverstone
Soltek
Spire
TerraTec
Western Digital

(c) 1999-2012 :: PC Ekspert Team :: Sva prava pridrzana. ISSN 1334-2940