Zaključak

Foxconnova ploča se pokazala kao vrlo solidan proizvod koji
je pristupačan cijenom širem krugu korisnika. Zagriženi overclockeri će sigurno
preskočiti ovaj model, no Foxconn ima ploče i za njih. S druge strane, svi
koji slažu računalo za koje žele da bude stabilno u radu i da ima solidne
performanse ovu ploču mogu uzeti u obzir. U odnosu na uspoređeni ABIT-ov model
ploča je nešto malo jeftinija, a performanse su im jednake. ABIT-ica je doduše
opremljenija (ima ICH9R), ali onima koji to ne trebaju ova ploča nudi dobar
odnos uloženo-dobiveno. Mislimo kako je jedina prava mana nedostatak Firewire
kontrolera. Oni koji kupe ovu ploču a ipak žele overclocirati uspjet će izvući
solidan rezultat, a sa korištenjem boljeg hlađenja vjerujemo kako bi ploča
išla i još više.

Napomena: Moramo se još jednom osvrnuti na overclocking i usporedbu
sa ABIT IP35 pločom. Iako je P35A postigla bolji rezultat smatramo kako je
naša testna ABIT-ica dosta podbacila jer nas njezini vlasnici upozoravaju
kako sa lakoćom postiže i 500MHz FSB-a.

Conclusion in English

Foxconn`s board has proven it self to be a good product which
is very affordable. Hardcore overclockers will definitely skip this model,
but Foxconn has other boards for them. On the other hand, everyone seeking
a stable board with solid performance should take this board in consideration.
In relation to ABIT`s board, P35A is a bit cheaper but has equal performance.
ABIT`s board has ICH9R with more features, but those who don`t need them P35A
offers a good price-performance rating. We think that the absence of Firewire
controler is the only real flaw this board has. Those who buy this board and
still want to overclock will get a fair result, and with custom cooling even
better.

Comment: We have to return to overclocking performance once
more and comparison with ABIT IP35 board. Although P35A board overclocked
better than IP35, we believe that our IP35 sample failed because owners of
IP35 boards informed us that it easily exceeds 500MHz FSB.